Connect with us

News

Scientists: All Blue-Eyed People Descended From Single Ancestor

Published

on

Scientists believe that all people with blue eyes descended from a single ancestor who lived 10,000 years ago.

Researchers have determined that individuals with blue eyes have the ability to trace their genealogy back between 6,000 and 10,000 years. It is generally accepted that the same genetic mutation can be found in the bodies of all people living in modern times who have blue eyes.

According to research conducted by scientists, it has been determined that every person with blue eyes on the planet can trace their family tree back to a single person who lived between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago.

They have also discovered that brown eyes were the natural color of all human eyes a very long time ago before a particular genetic mutation caused eye colors to shift.

The mutation takes place in a gene known as HERC2, which is responsible for turning off the OCA2 gene.

This gene is responsible for controlling the quantity of brown pigment that is found in our eyes.

It is thought that the first individual to have blue eyes existed in Europe approximately 10,000 years ago. It is also believed that every person living now who has blue eyes has the same mutation existing in their body.

Before a particular genetic mutation, all human eyes were brown. After that, a wide variety of eye colors emerged.

However, the mutation that causes blue eyes is a very specific type of gene change. The individual’s skin and hair color continue to have the same degrees of pigmentation even after the change.

Albinism would be the outcome of either a complete switch-off or a gene mutation that prevented the production of melanin.

41% of Americans have brown eyes, whereas 30% have green eyes and 27% have blue eyes. People with brown eyes make up the bulk of the American population.

Although there is a significant difference between green and brown colors, there is only a slight difference in the quantity of melanin that is present in blue eyes.

It has been suggested by Professor Eiberg of the University of Copenhagen that all individuals with blue eyes are descended from the same progenitor.

He stated that “They have inherited the identical switch at exactly the same point in their DNA.” [Citation needed]

To put it another way, the process by which eye color is determined is analogous to a wheel of genetic fortune. It is possible, but not certain, that a child born to two people with brown eyes will also have brown eyes. This is despite the fact that the gene for brown eyes is regarded to be the more dominant of the two.

The majority of Americans have brown eyes.

It is not impossible for two people who have brown eyes to have a child with blue eyes or the other way around.

However, there are some situations that suggest that our eye color might change at some point during our life. This is something that we should keep in mind. This can be brought on by a wide range of factors, including but not limited to traumas, infections, and damage caused by the sun.

There is evidence to show that the color of a baby’s eyes at birth has a significant impact on whether or not those eyes change color later in life. In one study, researchers from the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University observed and recorded the eye colors of 148 infants beginning shortly after birth.

According to the findings of the study, among kids born with brown eyes, blue eyes were more likely to change color throughout time, particularly in the beginning phases of the process.

The research also demonstrated that when a baby’s eye color did change, it would typically become darker rather than lighter. This was the opposite of what was expected to happen.

According to Professor Eiberg, “It simply indicates that nature is continually rearranging the human genome, building a genetic cocktail of human chromosomes, and testing out new alterations as it does so.”

 

Source Credit: Mirror.co.uk

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

‘Queen’ Founding Member Shares Crop Circle Picture

Published

on

On May 24th, Brian May, a founding member of the rock band Queen who later earned a Ph.D. in astrophysics, posted several images to Instagram of a crop circle seen near Marlborough, England.

“Have you noticed anything out of the ordinary here in the English countryside?” The photos were captioned by May. “I’d never seen a crop circle before. As a result, I’m always skeptical of them. But yesterday, as we flew back from our production rehearsal space, over a location near Marlborough, there was this. […] Who creates these fascinating works of mathematical art? Is it a hoax? Are they created by extraterrestrials? And… how…? And what is their goal?”
Responses to May’s post have been mixed, with some claiming that the phenomenon is paranormal, while others believe that hoaxers are to blame.

Crop circles have sparked speculation in the modern era since at least the mid-1970s, with theories ranging from hoaxers to otherworldly beings to “earth energies.”

Despite the fact that people have claimed responsibility for certain crop circle formations, mysterious circles of flattened plants discovered in fields date back much further than modern-day hoaxers.

W.Y. Evans-Wentz recorded folktales of faeries coming in the night to thresh farmers’ grain in his 1911 book The Fairy Faith in Celtic Countries. Similarly, in 1678, an English woodcut pamphlet depicts ‘The Mowing-Devil,’ who is shown mowing crops in a circular pattern.

While some dismiss these as folkloric inspiration for modern-day hoaxers, others see them as proof of a phenomenon that predates man-made imitation.

No one has yet claimed responsibility for the crop circle photographed by May.

 

Source Credit: SingularFortean.com

Continue Reading

News

DoD Announces Expanded Effort to Investigate UFOs

Published

on

According to a press release issued by the Department of Defense (DoD):

Due to the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2022, Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), amended her original directive to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security on July 15, 2022, by renaming and expanding the scope of the Airborne Object Identification and Management Group (AOIMSG) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).

USD(I&S) Hon. Ronald S. Moultrie informed the department today of the establishment of AARO within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, and named Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick, most recently the chief scientist at the Defense Intelligence Agency’s Missile and Space Intelligence Center, as its director.

The AARO’s mission will be to coordinate efforts across the Department of Defense and other federal departments and agencies in the United States to detect, identify, and attribute objects of interest in, on, or near military installations, operating areas, training areas, special use airspace, and other areas of interest, and, as needed, to mitigate any associated threats to operational safety and national security. Anomaly, unidentified space, airborne, submerged, and transmedium objects are included.

Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (USD(I&S)) Ronald Moultrie will lead the AARO Executive Council (AAROEXEC), which will provide oversight and direction to the AARO along the following primary lines of effort:

1. Surveillance, Collection and Reporting
2. System Capabilities and Design
3. Intelligence Operations and Analysis
4. Mitigation and Defeat
5. Governance
6. Science and Technology

This newly reported expansion of the Pentagon’s UFO investigation program follows low congressional trust in their investigative efforts.

Following the release of the much-anticipated preliminary assessment report on UFOs by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence last year, many in the intelligence community were critical of what they saw as the report’s failure to offer any concrete explanations for most of the incidents examined, particularly in light of concerns about secret Russian or Chinese technology.

The Pentagon then promised to revamp the task force in charge of investigating UFOs, which resulted in the formation of the AOIMSG, which has since been renamed the AARO.

This reflects Congress’ growing interest in UFOs, which was most recently demonstrated during a House Intelligence Subcommittee hearing on the subject last May—the first of its kind in more than 50 years.

The congressional hearing allowed lawmakers to question the Pentagon about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP)—the current government term for UFOs—and for government officials to explain their current position and outline plans to investigate the issue further.

During the hearing, there were few mentions of extraterrestrials, though the Pentagon did express a particular interest in reports containing unusual flight characteristics such as incredible speed, transmedium capabilities, and undetectable means of propulsion.

Since the existence of the Pentagon’s Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program (AATIP), which reportedly ran from 2007 to 2012, was made public in 2017, congressional interest in UFOs has skyrocketed.

Interest in the encounters between Navy pilots and UFOs grew, and in 2019, several senators, including Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), then vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, were briefed on them.

The Senate Intelligence Committee, led at the time by Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), then included a directive in their Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ordering the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to create a report on “unidentified aerial phenomena” in consultation with the Secretary of Defense.

That bill resulted in the formation of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF), which was in charge of producing the aforementioned preliminary assessment report.

 

Source Credit: SingularFortean.com

Continue Reading

News

The Marlborough Monkey is a Cryptid Fans Classic

Published

on

The latest documentary by researcher and filmmaker Karac St. Laurent, The Legend of the Marlborough Monkey, takes a fresh look at an older and often overlooked series of cryptid sightings in New Hampshire.

Most people don’t think of Bigfoot sightings in the northeastern United States, but St. Laurent has made a compelling case for taking the subject seriously while still having fun along the way.

The film is a tribute to the classic cryptid documentaries of the 1970s, and it was shot to look like an 8mm film being watched on a VHS tape. With thematic music and Robert Ready’s absolutely perfect deadpan narration, viewers could be forgiven for not immediately recognizing this as a documentary shot in 2021.

Despite its aesthetic, the film is very much a product of modern investigation, and St. Laurent conducts field investigations using equipment anachronistic to the 1970s, both solo and in collaboration with Small Town Monsters alum Aleksandar Petakov.

When some filmmakers might have been content to show only the interviews with researchers and witnesses included in the documentary, the field investigations were a nice touch. Folklorist John Horrigan is an especially bright addition to an already entertaining documentary, and his unique blend of wit and historical storytelling could have carried the film on its own.

Horrigan, interestingly, coined the term “The Marlborough Monkey” to describe the hairy humanoid being reported by New Hampshire residents in the 1990s, based on one account in which the witness said the creature looked like an orangutan. Those reports never stopped, and sightings of ‘The Marlborough Monkey’ are still being reported today.

St. Laurent, however, does not stop with stories; similarly to his first documentary, Release the Bodette Film, a variety of evidence is presented for the viewers to peruse. Much like that film, the viewer is ultimately left to decide what to believe, despite the fact that the vast majority of the film approaches the subject from a staunchly materialistic standpoint. Petakov makes a passing reference to high strangeness during an interview late in the film, but otherwise the assumption is that if something strange is going on, it’s most likely an undiscovered primate. This isn’t necessarily a negative, depending on your point of view, and those who prefer materialist science in the hunt for cryptids will appreciate the film’s mainstream take on the phenomenon.

That viewpoint is consistent with the 1970s-era documentaries to which it pays homage, and given the evidence presented, there’s never any sense that the investigation should be taking a different path. If The Legend of Boggy Creek is one of your favorite documentaries, check out The Legend of the Marlborough Monkey.

The Legend of the Marlborough Monkey has a run time of 43:14 and will be available to watch for free on the Crash-Course Cryptozoology YouTube channel starting at noon on September 12th. Expect it to be available on DVD around Thanksgiving.

 

Source & Photo Credit: SingularFortean.com

Continue Reading

Trending